Add to homescreen

If you want to add this app to home screen tap and then ‘Add to Home Screen’.

Anti-surge valve gland packing leak

What happened - icon

What happened?

During operator rounds, a gas leak was identified from the gland packing of an anti-surge valve (ASV).

The leak was audible and was heard by the operator.

The operator’s personal gas detector reported a reading of 53% at 150 mm (5.9 in).

Anti-surge valve and associated process pipework
What happened - icon

Why did it happen?

The stuffing box was corroded to the bonnet.

The corrosion stopped the packing from receiving tension and created the leak path.

The stuffing box had not been greased externally when installed, and additional silicone grease had not been used periodically to fill gaps and prevent water ingress.

The valve was situated on the top platform at a facility that was usually unmanned, which reduced the likelihood of an operator detecting a leak.

A periodic maintenance programme was not in place for anti-surge valves to prevent water ingress into the valve body.

IOGP Process Safety Fundamentals
What happened - icon

What did they learn?

Carry out periodic maintenance of anti-surge valves to check for water ingress into the valve body.

What happened - icon

Ask yourself or your crew

Does your site have anti-surge valves?

How do you check anti-surge valves for leaks?

What should you do if you detect a leak?

Are anti-surge valves subject to periodic maintenance to check for water ingress into the valve body?

How do you know the controls for preventing and detecting anti-surge valve leaks are working?

  • What happened?

    During operator rounds, a gas leak was identified from the gland packing of an anti-surge valve (ASV).

    The leak was audible and was heard by the operator.

    The operator’s personal gas detector reported a reading of 53% at 150 mm (5.9 in).

    Anti-surge valve and associated process pipework
  • Why did it happen?

    The stuffing box was corroded to the bonnet.

    The corrosion stopped the packing from receiving tension and created the leak path.

    The stuffing box had not been greased externally when installed, and additional silicone grease had not been used periodically to fill gaps and prevent water ingress.

    The valve was situated on the top platform at a facility that was usually unmanned, which reduced the likelihood of an operator detecting a leak.

    A periodic maintenance programme was not in place for anti-surge valves to prevent water ingress into the valve body.

    IOGP Process Safety Fundamentals
  • What did they learn?

    Carry out periodic maintenance of anti-surge valves to check for water ingress into the valve body.

    What learn - icon
  • Ask yourself or your crew

    Does your site have anti-surge valves?

    How do you check anti-surge valves for leaks?

    What should you do if you detect a leak?

    Are anti-surge valves subject to periodic maintenance to check for water ingress into the valve body?

    How do you know the controls for preventing and detecting anti-surge valve leaks are working?

    Ask your crew - icon
Published on 26/08/26 48 Views

An anti-surge valve leaked flammable gas after corrosion prevented the gland packing from being tensioned.

Original material courtesy of Safer Together (Australia)

To access the PDF and PowerPoint versions, please visit https://www.safertogether.com.au/learning-event-bulletins/operating-process-equipment-loss-of-containment-sep-2024

Safer Together - Maintain It video (Process Safety Awareness): https://www.safertogether.com.au/resources/products-and-programs/maintain-it

Safer Together – We all have a part to play (Process Safety Awareness): https://www.safertogether.com.au/resources/products-and-programs/process-safety-we-all-have-a-part-to-play

Safer Together – Contain It (Major Accident Event Awareness Training): https://www.safertogether.com.au/resources/products-and-programs/contain-it-wa-nt